Smokable Hemp Fight Continues at General Assembly

— Written By Marne Coit and last updated by
en Español / em Português

El inglés es el idioma de control de esta página. En la medida en que haya algún conflicto entre la traducción al inglés y la traducción, el inglés prevalece.

Al hacer clic en el enlace de traducción se activa un servicio de traducción gratuito para convertir la página al español. Al igual que con cualquier traducción por Internet, la conversión no es sensible al contexto y puede que no traduzca el texto en su significado original. NC State Extension no garantiza la exactitud del texto traducido. Por favor, tenga en cuenta que algunas aplicaciones y/o servicios pueden no funcionar como se espera cuando se traducen.


Inglês é o idioma de controle desta página. Na medida que haja algum conflito entre o texto original em Inglês e a tradução, o Inglês prevalece.

Ao clicar no link de tradução, um serviço gratuito de tradução será ativado para converter a página para o Português. Como em qualquer tradução pela internet, a conversão não é sensivel ao contexto e pode não ocorrer a tradução para o significado orginal. O serviço de Extensão da Carolina do Norte (NC State Extension) não garante a exatidão do texto traduzido. Por favor, observe que algumas funções ou serviços podem não funcionar como esperado após a tradução.


English is the controlling language of this page. To the extent there is any conflict between the English text and the translation, English controls.

Clicking on the translation link activates a free translation service to convert the page to Spanish. As with any Internet translation, the conversion is not context-sensitive and may not translate the text to its original meaning. NC State Extension does not guarantee the accuracy of the translated text. Please note that some applications and/or services may not function as expected when translated.

Collapse ▲

 — Smokable hemp continues to divide the North Carolina legislature as law enforcement and a burgeoning industry clash over whether, and when, to ban the state’s newfangled cash crop.

The back and forth produced a quasi-compromise Tuesday: Smokable hemp, legal right now and, according to some farmers, key to hemp industry profits, would be banned in North Carolina come May 1, 2020.

In the mean time, law enforcement would look for field tests to distinguish between hemp buds, which don’t have enough THC to get people high, and marijuana, which does. Without that, police chiefs, sheriffs and district attorneys around the state have said North Carolina will essentially legalize marijuana, not only making those laws unenforceable but making it so law enforcement can’t use the smell of marijuana smoke as probable cause in potentially bigger busts.

A similar issue has cropped up in Texas, where hemp laws have prosecutors tossing some marijuana cases and holding off on charging others.

There are rounds yet to fight as this long-debated bill moves to the House floor, then back to the Senate, where a key legislator on agricultural issues prefers a longer reprieve for the hemp buds. The difference at the moment is only 31 days, but it may remain a sticking point.

There’s more than a single industry at stake. The hemp sections of Senate Bill 315 are part of a wide-ranging Farm Act that affects the hog industry, sweet potato farmers and people in rural counties concerned that shooting ranges are about to get an exemption from county zoning laws.

“We’re running a big risk of walking away … without a farm bill,” Rep. William Brisson, R-Bladen, said during a Tuesday committee meeting.

If nothing passes, smokable hemp stays legal in North Carolina.

The state’s push to establish a hemp industry, producing rope, clothing and CBD oils with medicinal value, led to this point. As the industry grew, smokable hemp became a profit center that policymakers hadn’t expected.

Among other things, it’s a delivery method for CBD, and shops have popped up around the state selling hemp cigarettes alongside oils, lotions and other CBD products.

Michael Sims, co-owner of a CBD company in Charlotte, told legislators Tuesday that smokable hemp is just over half of his business. He said he has 52 employees, and he begged lawmakers not to upend his business model.

“It’s helping people,” he said. “Nobody’s dying. Jobs are being created. Why are we fighting this?”

Brunswick County Sheriff John Ingram, speaking for the North Carolina Sheriffs’ Association, said his office recently arrested someone with a large amount of heroin because of a search that started with a vehicle stop and the smell of marijuana. He said a random school parking lot sweep yielded marijuana and “several weapons,” heading off an attack “that was getting ready to happen at that school.”

If smokable hemp remains legal, “800 police K-9’s in the state would be rendered useless,” said Roxboro Police Chief David Hess, vice president of the North Carolina Association of Chiefs of Police.

But treating hemp buds like marijuana stigmatizes not just the flowers that look like pot, but other parts of the plant as well, farmers said.

Fen Rascoe, a farmer on the state’s Industrial Hemp Commission, said the state classifying the buds as marijuana makes it difficult to get crop insurance and will run people out of the business.

Brian Bullman, the founder of Asheville’s Carolina Hemp Company, said the legislature is essentially “banning a scent” and that other hemp products smell just like marijuana, too.

Because the bill contains some 14 pages of hemp regulations beyond the smokable ban, there was at least one call from within the industry to pass the bill despite the ban.

Hemp Magik founder Melissa Clark has been sounding the alarm at the General Assembly on potential problems with North Carolina crops, and she argued Tuesday that the state needs more testing for heavy metals, pesticides and mold.

“Right now, there’s no control, but a ton of businesses,” she said.

Rep. Jimmy Dixon, R-Duplin, pushed for the ban starting May 1, 2020, a compromise position after his efforts to ban smokable hemp as of this December. Sen. Brent Jackson, R-Sampson, said he could support a ban starting June 1, 2020. He said that gives farmers more time to sell this year’s still-legal crop.

Dixon’s position lost a voice vote in the House Rules committee Tuesday, with the chairman deciding his amendment failed based on loudness of ayes and nos from committee members. But Dixon called for a show of hands, and when those went up, he’d won by two votes.

“The longer we go without an official ban for smokable hemp, the more jeopardy we’re in relative to the dismissal of cases,” Dixon said.

“I feel like we need this June 1 date,” Jackson said.

Read more